Human Resources Outsourced research
Payroll Preparation and the Four-Eyes Review
Why payroll preparation benefits from a separate preparer and reviewer, with an evidence trail for changes.
Published · 10 sources
Research question
How can a small HR team reduce preventable payroll preparation errors? Separate data preparation from approval and make changes traceable.
Methodology
This report uses payroll recordkeeping guidance and internal-control principles to define a minimum review pattern. It does not provide tax or payroll advice.
Key statistic
The U.S. Department of Labor requires employers to keep specified payroll records for covered employees. The practical implication is to design the workflow so records are created as work happens.
Review pattern
The preparer reconciles starters, leavers, time, leave, approved changes, and exceptions. A separate reviewer checks totals and high-risk changes before submission. Both people sign the review log.
Implementation takeaway
Use a controlled change queue, never a last-minute informal message. Escalate missing approvals, unexplained variance, duplicate entries, and requests to bypass the normal cutoff.
Sources
Payroll preparation support for Philippines-based teams
Need help setting up the admin side of a payroll handoff? See the Philippines-based Payroll Preparation Support service for a starter task list, review points, and client approval boundaries. Review the service scope.
Related Research
HRIS Correction Requests: Preserve Source Evidence Before Changing a Record
Candidate Scheduling Across Time Zones: Prove the Slot Before Sending
Employee Document Intake: Design for Wrong-Person and Wrong-File Events